AnTuTu v10 Archives ~ My Mobile India

Highlights OPPO Reno10 Pro+ shows resilient CPU Throttling, maintaining 75% of its peak performance. Samsung Galaxy S23 FE edges ahead in Geekbench v6 scores, suggesting quicker task execution. In AnTuTu v10, Reno10 Pro+ excels in GPU and Memory Management tests. Galaxy S23 FE leads in CPU and User Experience metrics in AnTuTu v10 tests. In an increasingly competitive smartphone market, making an informed choice is no small feat. Two smartphones that have caught the attention of Indian consumers are the Samsung Galaxy S23 FE and the OPPO Reno10 Pro+, both priced at approximately Rs 60,000. We rely on benchmark tests by 91mobiles to dig deeper into their performance metrics, so as to offer potential buyers a comprehensive evaluation. In terms of processing prowess, the OPPO Reno 10 Pro+ packs in the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 SoC while on the Galaxy S23 FE, the chipset is the Exynos 2200. There’s up to 12GB of LPDDR5X RAM available on both devices. With that out of the way let’s start this comparison. Processor and Throttling Performance: A Closer Look Processor and Throttling Performance: A Closer Look In CPU Throttle tests, the OPPO Reno10 Pro+ exhibits noteworthy resilience against performance degradation. The fact that the phone only showed a 75% decrease in peak performance under a 50-thread load for half an hour is impressive. This could be particularly important for users who frequently run high-performance applications or multitask extensively, as it suggests longer periods of sustained performance. On the other hand, the Samsung Galaxy S23 FE's performance drop of 59% in the same test raises some questions about its suitability for power users. While this doesn't necessarily make it a poor choice, it does signal that the phone might not handle sustained high-load scenarios as well as the Reno10 Pro+. Geekbench Metrics: More Than Just Numbers Geekbench Metrics When evaluating the Geekbench v6 scores, it's worth noting that while the differences may appear minor, they can be more pronounced in real-world usage. The Galaxy S23 FE nudges ahead of the OPPO handset, albeit marginally. In the single-core and multi-core tests, Samsung's offering posted scores of 1,573 and 3,873 respectively. Meanwhile, OPPO Reno10 Pro+ managed to secure 1,400 in single-core and 3,796 in multi-core tests. Although the differences are minimal, the Samsung Galaxy S23 FE appears to hold an edge in processing speed for general tasks. Higher scores in single-core and multi-core tests mean that the Galaxy S23 FE would theoretically be more agile in general computing tasks, be it loading apps or running complex algorithms. This could make all the difference for users whose primary needs include quick processing for everyday tasks. AnTuTu Benchmarking: Diving into the Details AnTuTu Benchmarking: Diving into the Details Turning our attention to the AnTuTu v10 results, the scenario flips. The OPPO Reno10 Pro+ surpassed the Galaxy S23 FE with an overall score of 10,76,839 against Samsung's 10,73,002. Moreover, when dissecting the sub-scores, the Reno10 Pro+ excelled particularly in GPU and memory management (MEM) tests, while the Galaxy S23 FE dominated CPU and User Experience (UX) tests. The AnTuTu v10 tests further accentuate the specialized strengths of each phone. The OPPO Reno10 Pro+'s lead in GPU and MEM tests makes it an excellent candidate for users with a penchant for gaming or using graphics-intensive applications. Coupled with its superior memory management, this makes the Reno10 Pro+ an attractive option for performance-hungry users. Conversely, the Galaxy S23 FE's lead in CPU and UX tests suggests that users can expect a smoother, more responsive interface and faster computational tasks, potentially offering a more intuitive and satisfying user experience. Choosing Between Two Strong Contenders In summary, both the Samsung Galaxy S23 FE and the OPPO Reno10 Pro+ offer significant but different strengths: Samsung Galaxy S23 FE Leads in CPU and UX tests, offering a more seamless user experience Holds a slight edge in Geekbench scores, promising quicker task completion OPPO Reno10 Pro+ Excels in GPU and MEM tests, promising enhanced graphics and memory performance Shows superior CPU throttling performance, indicating resilience under load With such tightly contested performance metrics, the choice ultimately boils down to individual preferences and specific use cases. Are you looking for a device optimized for daily tasks and smooth user interaction? The Samsung Galaxy S23 FE is worth considering. However, if you demand higher graphical performance and better load management, the OPPO Reno10 Pro+ emerges as the better fit. FAQs How do these smartphones fare in CPU Throttling tests? The OPPO Reno10 Pro+ shows only a 75% reduction in peak performance, suggesting longer sustained performance. The Galaxy S23 FE experiences a 59% drop, indicating it may not handle high-load scenarios as well. What do the Geekbench v6 scores tell us about these smartphones? While the differences are marginal, Galaxy S23 FE scores higher, indicating it might be faster in general computing tasks like app loading and algorithm processing. Who leads in AnTuTu v10 benchmarks? OPPO Reno10 Pro+ takes the lead in overall score, but it particularly shines in GPU and Memory Management, suggesting better performance in graphics-intensive tasks and better memory management. Which smartphone should I choose based on performance metrics? Your choice should depend on your specific needs. If you prioritize general computing speed and a smoother user experience, go for the Galaxy S23 FE. If you need better graphics and memory management, Reno10 Pro+ is a better choice. Also Read: Samsung Galaxy S23 FE design, specifications leaked ahead of official announcement: Check The First Look & Leaked Renders Also Read: Samsung Galaxy S23 FE tipped to arrive in no Snapdragon Version; to feature Exynos 2200 Chipset & superior camera Also Read: OPPO Reno9 Series Undergoes Testing, Ready for Launch in India in 2023

AnTuTu v10

Samsung Galaxy S23 FE vs OPPO Reno10 Pro+: A Detailed Performance Comparison