Highlights
- A federal judge blocks parts of the Texas SCOPE Act.
- The law aims to increase social media monitoring and filtering to protect teenagers.
- The judge ruled that these requirements threatened free speech and issued an injunction.
- However, some provisions like age verification for adult content remain in effect.
The discourse around social media censorship or internet censorship has reached the highest of courts in different countries.
As of now, we have seen rulings in such cases mostly against big tech companies.
However, a recent federal order on a Texus law has put the question of social media censorship into a different perspective.
The federal judge has put a last-minute partial block on a Texus Act, which demanded that social media companies strengthen their “monitoring and filtering” of the platform in order to limit its access for teenagers.
A federal court ruling clarified in its order that social media companies cannot be forced to block certain content from teenagers under a new Texas law.
The court viewed the Texus Act as an infringement of free speech.
The law, known as the Securing Children Online Through Parental Empowerment (SCOPE) Act, was set to take effect on September 1st.
The law requires a range of web services particularly big social media platforms to verify users’ ages and restrict data collection from minors.
It also demanded that social media companies block harmful content like substance abuse and grooming.
However, Judge Robert Pitman ruled that these requirements threaten free speech and issued an injunction against them while the case continues.
The order didn’t block the entire law as some provisions, which include the age verification for adult content will continue to remain in effect.
The ruling came after tech industry groups NetChoice, the CCIA, and the Foundation for Individual Rights and Expression (FIRE) challenged the law.
The group argued that such a law could lead to selective enforcement and vague restrictions.
“Terms like ‘promoting,’ ‘glorifying,’ ‘substance abuse,’ ‘harassment,’ and ‘grooming’ are undefined, despite their potential wide breadth and politically charged nature.
At what point, for example, does alcohol use become ‘substance abuse?’
When does an extreme diet cross the line into an ‘eating disorder?”
Judge Robert Pitman noted in his ruling.
Judge Pitman highlighted concerns about the potential for censorship, noting that controversial content might be removed from social media while remaining accessible on other platforms.
The case is ongoing and further rulings could impact the law’s future enforcement.
FAQs
Q1. What is the Texas SCOPE Act?
Answer. The Texas SCOPE Act, or Securing Children Online Through Parental Empowerment Act, aimed to increase social media monitoring and filtering to protect teenagers.
It required social media platforms to verify users’ ages, restrict data collection from minors, and block harmful content like substance abuse and grooming.
Q2. What’s the court order against the Texas SCOPE Act?
Answer. A federal judge, Robert Pitman, partially blocked SCOPE the Act, citing that these requirements threaten free speech.
The judge issued an injunction against these provisions while the case continues, although some parts of the law, such as age verification for adult content, remain in effect.
Q3. Who challenged the Texus SCOPE Act?
Answer. Tech industry groups, including NetChoice, the CCIA, and the Foundation for Individual Rights and Expression (FIRE) have challenged the Texas SCOPE Act in court.
Also Read: Instagram Enhances User Control with New ‘Limits,’ ‘Restrict,’ and ‘Notes’ Feature
Join MyMobile WhatsApp Channel
